One of the changes to the ITC is that all tournaments, even
those under 16 players, award full points. Secondly, the modifier for the size
the tournament has doubled. That means playing well on the big stage has its
rewards.
Tournaments are now classified into three events. On the
surface, this seems like fancy nomenclature. The reality is very different.
As mentioned above, only your top 5 events count. In
previous years, that meant as long as you can clean up at Bob’s Comics &
Games 5 times you should have an easy 500+ point season. That is not the case
this season, as only three events of less than 28 players, or RTT size, will
count towards your top 5.
To get full points, you will need to attend the following
- 3 RTTs, 1 GT, 1 Major Event
- Replace any RTT with another GT event or attend a Major Event
- Attend 5 Major Events
This is actually a clever idea. Larger events are something
every player should experience. The excitement, community and pageantry of
seeing that many players in one spot is something that will really ignite the
hobby in players.
Secondly, the level of difficulty goes up, as the field gets
larger. Larger tournaments will need additional rounds to determine a true
winner. A GT level event will need at least five rounds, while some major
events can go seven rounds. The mental endurance required to be at the top of
your game for that long is a remarkable feat. Given the calculations needed
during the average 2-3 hour game of 40k, a five round weekend tournament is
equivalent to taking the SAT three times in the same weekend.
Lastly, more rounds leads to more balance among the match
ups. Getting a bad or favorable match up in a three round tournament is a bit
of luck. To duplicate that luck over five or more rounds is less likely,
forcing the players to work themselves out of bad situations. Some lists that
rely on certain warlord traits or psychic powers will more likely expose their
weakness in larger events. For example, my friend posted this lengthy
explanation of how he is 79% likely to get the psychic power he needs his list
to be “unstoppable”. I will spare you his math and bravado to make my point.
In a three game event, 79% or 1/5 chance is (1/5 + 1/5 +1/5)
= 3/5 or a 60% he will play one game without his super combo. Simply put it
should happen once every other event. This may be an acceptable risk for most
players.
In a five round event, there is a 100% statistical chance it
happens once that weekend. Assuming that my dramatic friend is a right and he
cannot win without this power the best he can do is 4-1, which is an outside
chance at best to win the event. Perhaps the list needs some more work.
How big is worth my time?
Any game experience is worth its weight in gold. In several
studies among chess players, there was no genetic advantage between competitive
chess players and Grand Masters. This a big deal when you consider anyone less
than 6 feet tall has a slim chance to compete in the NBA, NHL, or NFL. What
does differentiate Grand Masters from others is the number of games they play
at a high level.
If you want to get better, play more games at the highest
level possible.
For more analysis, let us do some math.
For every 16 players at the start of the tournament, your
score increases by 5%
The key to winning is to finish in the Top 8, as that is
where the bigger points are. Any size event will have a top eight. Where larger
events help players is the next level groupings become much larger and more
attainable.
16 players
|
32 players
|
48 players
|
64 players
|
|
Top 10% outside of the top 8 (55 points)
|
1 player
|
2 players
|
4 players
|
6 players
|
Next 20% (40 points)
|
1 player
|
5 players
|
8 players
|
11 players
|
Next 30% (30 points)
|
2 players
|
7 players
|
12 players
|
17 players
|
Last 40% (20 points)
|
4 players
|
10 players
|
16 players
|
22 players
|
Then you take into the size of the tournament factors
16 players
|
32 players
|
48 players
|
64 players
|
|
First Place
|
105 points
|
110 points
|
115 points
|
120 points
|
2nd
|
95 points
|
99 points
|
104 points
|
108 points
|
3rd
|
89 points
|
94 points
|
98 points
|
102 points
|
4th
|
84 points
|
88 points
|
92 points
|
96 points
|
5th
|
79 points
|
83 points
|
86 points
|
90 points
|
6th
|
74 points
|
77 points
|
81 points
|
84 points
|
7th
|
68 points
|
72 points
|
75 points
|
78 points
|
8th
|
63 points
|
66 points
|
69 points
|
72 points
|
Top 10% outside of the top 8
|
58 points
|
60 points
|
63 points
|
66 points
|
Next 20%
|
42 points
|
44 points
|
46 points
|
48 points
|
Next 30%
|
31 points
|
33 points
|
34 points
|
36 points
|
Last 40%
|
21 points
|
22 points
|
23 points
|
24 points
|
If you are not a fan of numbers, here is a narrative
version: a player who finishes 12th at a 48-player tournament will
get more points than a player who finished eighth at a 16-player event.
Bottom line: playing well at larger events will be worth it.
No comments:
Post a Comment